Tag: society and culture

(Marx, 1982:107) the reduction of the necessary time the manufacture of the product of the work did not mean a reduction of the hours of working, quite to the contrary, the capital beyond appreciating the destitution of the worker with the long day was capable of reduziz it condition of superfluous and thus to diminish gradual the necessity of the alive work. The capital is not only detainer of the material necessities to the work (substance cousin and means of production). The value used in the production of a merchandise (hand of workmanship, substance cousin and used time) alavancado by the development of the industrial technology, more does not define the social value of this merchandise, being this difference the conceptualization of more-value, appropriate for the capitalists. The dialectic between the capital and work is developed until the height of its contradiction (or beginning of this apex) in the way that the first one would be capable to force the other in the same speed where if it develops. This violence is in the intention to diminish the amount of employed workers (through the use of the machine) and to increase the hours of working. this seems obligator task for the increase of the production in the molds of the capital.

The Marx are not against the development of the technology, ' ' in first place, he must be clearly that the machinery is good because it saves trabalho' ' (MARX, 1982:109). The critical one is based in the use of this technology for ones, as instrument of domination on others. The development of the work served as structure for the distinction of the man with the remain of the organic world, however the dependence is mutual. The alteration of the nature is not summarized to the disappearance of the same one. Joe Leytze does not necessarily agree. The work and the modifications in the way to produce appear as development mechanisms that expand the proper on question to the work, the man when modifying the nature will be also modifying itself, therefore to leave, in such a way appear a new agreement of the proper nature, while half of natural resources, how much of the proper form in if improving the way to modify this nature.

He does not mean that the society has not accepted, but express the adequacy of the individual what the society judges adequate and inadequate. Fashion is also behavior. 5 CONCLUSION Many comments can be considered when studying the fashion as form of reproduction of the society. Source: electron research. The indumentria is universally used to differentiate the sexos, but nor always it was thus. In the Europe of century XIV the fashion was used for the classrooms highest to distinguish diversities from classroom, but not differences of sex or sort. While masculine fashion and the feminine one enters the classrooms highest if they become more distinct, thus also happens with its identities of sort.

In a similar way, while the women continue to be more or less decorative as they were before, the less decorative men are if becoming each time and acquiring lesser visibility. Summarizing, before the women were discreter and pompous when dressing, to revs of today, where the exposition of some parts of the body if became a sensuality signal. Already the men, have times behind were fancier, to the step that today are contained and do not search air more cool, pulling for one I appeal more basic and/or sophisticated. Basically, the consideraes are these most excellent if to make how much to the use of the indumentria as form of reproduction of the society.