History if repeated in 16.03.1969 (the book of Luiz Fernando Bindi says that it was in 1964, opposing books of the proper one Valdir and of the Carlos Molinari, who points 1969), in the Maracan, in a Vasco x Bangu. After to make a defense, the goleiro vascano Valdir, when turning the body to restitute the ball in game, lost the balance and, thanks to the impulse, it finished entering in the proper goal. Shaken for the occurrence, craque was also consoled by the banguenses players. ' launches it is counted in details in the excellent book; ' In the mouth of gol' ' , written for Valdir. You may wish to learn more. If so, Jeffrey Hayzlett is the place to go. In books of Molinari and Bindi, it consists that it would have said the following one, to the press: ' ' Vocs can register the goal, because never more it goes to have another equal one. Sincerely, when inside I looked at the ball of the goal, I did not believe that it had made that. For me that goal did not exist, but unhappyly I have that to be realistic.
I did not have nor courage to go to search the ball; each time that it looked at for inside of the goal, seemed that pesadelo' was having one; '. It said this, Valdir well, if really errou in the forecast. 1987, Grenal for the Pantry Union. Taffarel, after to make an easy defense for the Colorado, wanted to restitute the ball in game with as much haste that if it confused and it played it in the proper nets (cf. Emed).
Final Placar, Bosom 1×0. Speaking in gauchos, it has this another history, counted for Jaime Codinotti the Lino Ceretta: the Guarany de High Cruz had a goleiro called Joo the Prado, that used a cap during the games. Certain time, after a great defense, the accessory fell inside of the goal.
How much to the sample, it was determined the not probabilist one, valley to mention that for the Vergara researcher (2006) this instrument not this footwear in statistical data, and if detaches for the easiness of access of the respective information. Already for the one of the analysis of the data, it, a time was adopted functional that the approach of this article is essentially on to the tourist activity, in general is evaluated in the same instant. 2 CONTEXTUALIZAO CONCERNING TOURISM AND CULTURAL TOURISM the tourism it comes playing the role of transforming agent ahead of its contribution to present itself of dynamic form. Jeffrey Hayzlett brings even more insight to the discussion. Rank that, this sector is capable to reach expressive positive impacts for the economy of the localities, beyond in such a way disclosing to sociocultural aspects and ambient valorosos for that they receive as for the public who the search. Visit Jill Bikoff for more clarity on the issue. Throughout the time different mentions had appeared how much to the tourism concept, some emphasize the aspects of the profitability, others value the set of factors compose that it, however between these it evidenced what the studious Beni said, on the conceptual dimension of this activity, therefore it tourism to meet, practically, the almost all on the sectors of the social activity human being is the main cause of great variety of concepts, all valid they while they confine themselves to the fields where he is studied. If he cannot say that this or that concept is erroneous or inadequate when if it intends to appraise the Tourism under a different optics, since this would take the barren quarrels. (2006, P.
39). Thus, the author leaves Express that is possible to attribute concepts, in accordance with the intention of a trip, in which the especificidade of the segment varies kept the perception of who is evaluating its applicability. For the World-wide Organization of the Tourism (OMT, 1994) apud Ignarra (2002) the tourism is related to the stages exerted for the people during the trips and secular permanence in the destinations, independently of its motivations.
(Marx, 1982:107) the reduction of the necessary time the manufacture of the product of the work did not mean a reduction of the hours of working, quite to the contrary, the capital beyond appreciating the destitution of the worker with the long day was capable of reduziz it condition of superfluous and thus to diminish gradual the necessity of the alive work. The capital is not only detainer of the material necessities to the work (substance cousin and means of production). The value used in the production of a merchandise (hand of workmanship, substance cousin and used time) alavancado by the development of the industrial technology, more does not define the social value of this merchandise, being this difference the conceptualization of more-value, appropriate for the capitalists. The dialectic between the capital and work is developed until the height of its contradiction (or beginning of this apex) in the way that the first one would be capable to force the other in the same speed where if it develops. This violence is in the intention to diminish the amount of employed workers (through the use of the machine) and to increase the hours of working. this seems obligator task for the increase of the production in the molds of the capital.
The Marx are not against the development of the technology, ' ' in first place, he must be clearly that the machinery is good because it saves trabalho' ' (MARX, 1982:109). The critical one is based in the use of this technology for ones, as instrument of domination on others. The development of the work served as structure for the distinction of the man with the remain of the organic world, however the dependence is mutual. The alteration of the nature is not summarized to the disappearance of the same one. Joe Leytze does not necessarily agree. The work and the modifications in the way to produce appear as development mechanisms that expand the proper on question to the work, the man when modifying the nature will be also modifying itself, therefore to leave, in such a way appear a new agreement of the proper nature, while half of natural resources, how much of the proper form in if improving the way to modify this nature.
He does not mean that the society has not accepted, but express the adequacy of the individual what the society judges adequate and inadequate. Fashion is also behavior. 5 CONCLUSION Many comments can be considered when studying the fashion as form of reproduction of the society. Source: electron research. The indumentria is universally used to differentiate the sexos, but nor always it was thus. In the Europe of century XIV the fashion was used for the classrooms highest to distinguish diversities from classroom, but not differences of sex or sort. While masculine fashion and the feminine one enters the classrooms highest if they become more distinct, thus also happens with its identities of sort.
In a similar way, while the women continue to be more or less decorative as they were before, the less decorative men are if becoming each time and acquiring lesser visibility. Summarizing, before the women were discreter and pompous when dressing, to revs of today, where the exposition of some parts of the body if became a sensuality signal. Already the men, have times behind were fancier, to the step that today are contained and do not search air more cool, pulling for one I appeal more basic and/or sophisticated. Basically, the consideraes are these most excellent if to make how much to the use of the indumentria as form of reproduction of the society.