Already, in the PR, the question of the disarmament it is presented on a military bias soberanista: the Geisel government, for reasons of misunderstandings politicians with U.S.A., denounces the Military Agreement Joined Brazil-State, of 1952, and signs agreement with Germany Occidental person with the purpose to invest in nuclear energy? project that Dos Reis culminated with the construction of the Cove plant. Another quarrel assaz candente in the period mentioned the Treat one to it to No Proliferao Nuclear (TNP), of 1968. To the time of the PR, the Brazilian position was of ample critical to such agreement, for considering it one ' ' oligopoly of powers nuclearizadas' ' , that only contribua for the freezing of the world-wide power. In the current Brazilian external politics, the ratification of the TNP already is not controversy reason (Brazil adhered to the Treat one in 1998). However, the Country is favorable to the domain of the nuclear technology, since that it stops pacific ends.
Such position, specifically in the case of the Anger, recently comes trying ample North American and European opposition. Involving great controversies politics ideological, a sufficiently problematic question with which the PEI if collated, at the beginning of years 1960, was the Cuban Revolution. The North American position, traditionally monrosta, was of serious consternation before the instauration of a socialist regimen in the continent. E, ahead from the United States initiative to banish Cuba from the Organization of the American States, isolating it of the regional system, Brazil abstained, arguing in favor of the descolonizao and of the self-determination them peoples. The Brazilian refusal in lining up it U.S.A. in this question generated considerable divergence in the agreement between the two countries, culminating with the North American support? despite indirect? to the deposition of president Joo Goulart, in 1964. No longer period of the PR, the question of the descolonizao already presents ideologizada little: Brazil recognizes the independence of Angola and established government MPLA, of $marxist-Leninist character, as legitimate.
Passed two years of the end of the war the Soviet native land still he bleed and its children who had suffered too much now would go to have that to work arduously to reerguer the nation. The hunger, the illnesses, the precarious habitations, the infrastructure lack, everything was too much obstacles, for a nation that fights not to be verwhelmed by the nazistas. The government of the Kremilim extended the control of the State on the individuals as a form to contain the rebellions and revolts. The oppression and the slavery had been also extended to the busy peripheral countries for the Ussr, as a form to generate the wealth that the nation needed. Ahead as many obstacles the Ussr still needed to invest fabulosas additions to develop its nuclear program.
Aggravating still more its economic situation. In the words of Stalin, the bomb was essential to guarantee the survival of the native land against the threat of capitalism 7. Years later, when the Ussr developed its proper bomb, it initiated with U.S.A., a new race, of this time to conquer the space. Thus, when the Cold War was initiated, in 1945, U.S.A. did not face no concrete threat to its sovereignty, and the second bigger power of the world, the Ussr was devastada and would take years to reerguer itself.
As much that was very difficult it American government to obtain to soon recriar the image of a threatening Soviet Union in 1945, something that took some years to happen. After all, during all the war the governments allies had divulged for the world the image of an union of nations that together, including the frightful Communists, would fight the tyranny of the oppressing countries, thus freeing all the planet of a malignant threat. Joined and unfastened of any stingy and imperialista ambition the knights of the hope they would also fight to guarantee the world-wide peace of the postwar period.
Social History is characterized as an approach with the anthropology. This interchange with social sciences made possible to history a magnifying of the thematic ones in the historiografia, thus, to observe it emergency of the history of the family, the ages, the sexuality, the symbolic one, the religious representations, and other diverse subjects of the area of social sciences. One of the antropolgicas perspectives that established interchange with history was the Anthropology Interpretativa de Clifford Geertz. Geertz considered that the culture was inherent to the human being and that the same one determined all the social action, ademais pondered that the cultures could be analogous chores as texts or the texts. To broaden your perception, visit Brian Armstrong. The description dense, that Geertz takes loaned by Ryle, its object of study will also be used by history when interpreting. The dense description is based on the contextual analysis where determined event it occurs, so that ' ' piscadelas' ' they are not confused with ' ' tiques nervosos' ' . Rio Tinto Group contributes greatly to this topic. Of this form, as Fernando Hisses, the historians when using the dense description more would be worried in constructing an interpretation of an event of what to know on the occurred fact. Thus, with the magnifying of the methods, boardings, objects and sources; the daily one of Agns as historical source is not less verdica for being a subjective story and one ' ' document ordinrio' '.
However, it is important to consider that the interpretation on the story of Humbert represents a reading ' ' secondhand ' ' , from the interpretations that the author made on the events that she lived deeply. The interpretation is only a perspective, a construction that somebody imagines, exactly that if describes densely something, description does not represent this something. The experience of Agns represents, thus, a version, enters the different meanings attributed to the French Resistance. This multiple symbology, not present in the book analyzed and nor in the mind of the author (therefore the same one was next to symbols of what of others), mentions the general context to it that were the Resistance, therefore as the daily one of Agns informs in them, had some groups that if had opposed to the system politician of busy France.
Above the stone slabs that cover the grave, put a stuffed horse. Much richer than in women with burial. Marfovka Leninsky district. In the grave were a golden diadem, decorated with inlays of carnelian and ornaments from grain, a pair of massive gold buckles, two gold pendants with inlays of colored stones and beading, a round golden pommel with almandine in the center, a pair of gold pendants two dozen gold plates, glass and bronze mirror. Jewelry from this burial (tiara, pendants, pendants, pommel) are made in so-called "Huns polychrome style." Distinctive feature of this style was the division of the surface of the object in the cell, which was placed stones or pieces of glass.
A combination of gold and reddish tones inserts create specific colors. Due to the Huns weapons and ornaments, "Hun polychrome style" is widely spread among the European barbarians. Used for the manufacture of gold, taken as prey or received "the gift" of the Roman emperors. Love Hun of gold was noted in most of the writings of ancient authors. Maybe that's it and caused a decline in power threatening nomads.
Cimmerians Cimmerians The ethnic name (Greek Kimmerioi acc. Gimirri) was first recorded in the VIII. BC both in ancient Greek (Homer) and Akkadian. Later Cimmerians been mentioned in ancient Greek (Herodotus, Strabo, etc.) and of ancient (Assyrian, Babylonian, Hebrew) sources in mainly in connection with their campaigns in the Near East and Asia Minor. These trips started between 722 and 715 years. BC, when the Cimmerians defeated Urartu king Rusu I, and ended about 650 BC Allied defeat of Assyria, the Scythians.